Comparison of the diagnostic value of low dose computed tomography of the axial skeleton and skeletal radiography in patients with multiple myeloma

Authors

Keywords:

whole body low dose computed tomography (WBLDCT), lytic lesions, skeletal radiograph, multiple myeloma

Abstract

Background:  Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by bone marrow infiltration and clonal proliferation of plasma cells. The detection of lytic bone lesions represents a criterion defining a symptomatic and treatment-requiring MM. Aim of the study: To compare the accuracy of whole body low dose CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal radiographs in detecting myeloma lesions and to establish the feasibility of (WBLDCT) protocol as an alternative to conventional X-ray imaging. Patients and Methods: A cross sectional analytical study had been conducted in Al- Yarmouk teaching hospital in Baghdad. A total of 41 patients, their ages range between 40 – 82 years, diagnosed with multiple myeloma, underwent WBLDCT and digital radiography (DR). Results: There was weak agreement between WBLDCT and X-ray in detection of lytic lesions in skull, spine and pelvic bones with (Kappa = 0.382, p = 0.007) for skull, (Kappa = 0.147, p=0.077) for spine, (Kappa = 0.223, p = 0.023) for pelvic bones. WBLDCT identified more osteolytic lesions than radiograph with total number of lesions detected with WBLDCT was 520 versus 152 for radiographs (p<0.001). Conclusion: Whole body Low-dose CT is superior to skeletal radiography with a comparable radiation dose for detection of lytic lesions of MM, with a fast scanning time and high resolution images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bezieau S, Devilder MC, Avet‐Loiseau H, Mellerin MP, Puthier D, Pennarun E, Rapp MJ, Harousseau JL, Moisan JP, Bataille R. High incidence of N and K‐Ras activating mutations in multiple myeloma and primary plasma cell leukemia at diagnosis. Human mutation. 2001 Sep;18(3):212-24.

Kröpil P, Fenk R, Fritz LB, Blondin D, Kobbe G, Mödder U, Cohnen M. Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma. European radiology. 2008 Jan1;18(1):51-8.

Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, Tosi P, Beksac M, Sezer O, Siegel D, Lokhorst H, Kumar S, Rajkumar SV, Niesvizky R. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia. 2009 Sep;23(9):1545.

Kyle RA, Child JA, Anderson K, Barlogie B, Bataille R, Bensinger W, Bladé J, Boccadoro M, Dalton W, Dimopoulos M, Djulbegovic B. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. British journal of hematology. 2003;121(5):749-57.

Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009 Jan;23(1):3.

Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer. 1975 Sep 1;36(3):842-54.

Ludwig H, Sonneveld P, Davies F, Bladé J, Boccadoro M, Cavo M, Morgan G, de la Rubia J, Delforge M, Dimopoulos M, Einsele H. European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies in 2014. The oncologist. 2014 Aug 1;19(8):829-44.

Bannas P, Kröger N, Adam G, Derlin T. Modern imaging techniques in patients with multiple myeloma Rofo. 2013;185:26–33.

Allisy-Roberts P, Williams JR. Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging, radiation hazards and protection. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008 second edition page 44.

Mettler Jr FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):254-63.

Schick F. Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. European radiology. 2005 May 1;15(5):946-59.

Princewill K, Kyere S, Awan O, Mulligan M. Multiple myeloma lesion detection with whole body CT versus radiographic skeletal survey. Cancer investigation. 2013 Mar 19;31(3):206-11.

Diaz CI, Rey PJ, Ramírez PM, Herrera PE, Verduga DJ, Jara DA, Aveiga RA, Rivera RH, Zambrano CL, Mendoza JJ, Suárez JE. Características clínico-epidemiológicas de los pacientes amputados ingresados a la unidad de pie diabético del Hospital Abel Gilbert Pontón, Ecuador. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2019;38(2):40-3.

Tamayo D, Hernández J, Carrillo S, Hernández J. Funciones ejecutivas en estudiantes de undécimo grado de colegios oficiales de Cúcuta y Envigado. AVFT Archivos venezolanos de farmacología y terapéutica. 2019;38(2):125-31.

Andrade AV, Cruz JG, Jiménez SI, Demera JA, Ronda JR, Uzhca BS, Tinoco YJ, Lara JC. Promoción de la actividad física en los pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular durante el confinamiento por covid-19. Sindrome Cardiometabólico. 2020;10(1):16-9.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-05

How to Cite

Taher , Y. M. ., Hussam , S. ., & Dawod Saeed , H. . (2023). Comparison of the diagnostic value of low dose computed tomography of the axial skeleton and skeletal radiography in patients with multiple myeloma. AVFT – Archivos Venezolanos De Farmacología Y Terapéutica, 41(7). Retrieved from http://caelum.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_aavft/article/view/25940