SABER UCV >
1) Investigación >
Artículos Publicados >
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10872/15431
|
Título : | Use and Abuse of Laboratory Tests in Clinical Immunology: Critical Considerations of Eight Widely Used Diagnostic Procedures |
Autor : | BENTWICH, Z. BIANCO COLMENARES, NICOLÁS E. JÄGER, L. HOUBA, V. LAMBERT, P. H . KNAPP, W. ROSE, N. SELIGMANN, M. THOMPSON, R. TORRIGIANI, G. DE WECK, A. |
Palabras clave : | immunoglobulins Diagnostic Procedures radial immunodiffusion nephelometry nephelometer |
Fecha de publicación : | 1982 |
Editorial : | CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY |
Citación : | Vol. 24;pp 122-138 |
Resumen : | Many methods for the quantitative assessment of immunoglobulins have been described. Two of them are currently of the most value and of comparable accuracy: (1) radial immunodiffusion (RID) and (2) nephelometry. When patient load is relatively low, RID will probably remain the method of choice. However, with a high patient load and if nephelometer is already available, nephelometry is useful. Radial immunodiffusion has a constant coefficient of variation which, under optimal conditions , may be less than 10% except at extremely low concentrations. The limit of accurate protein measurements, using low concentrations of antisera, is about 10 mg/liter (10 μg/ml). Techniques using limited diffusion are more accurate than those with timed diffusion. With normal sera, results can be obtained after 24 hr of diffusion but more time may be required for the assessment of very high or very low levels. |
URI : | http://hdl.handle.net/10872/15431 |
ISSN : | 0090-1229 (Linking) 0090-1229 (Print) |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos Publicados
|
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.
|